The Innocents: A Story for Lovers — Key Ideas to Explore

(0 User reviews) 355

In Category - Psychological Domestic Love Stories

Authors: Lewis, Sinclair, 1885-1951 Digital Source: Project Gutenberg Gutenberg Release Year: 2008 First Publication Year: Not confirmed

Key Word: Married people -- Fiction; New York (State) -- Social life and customs -- Fiction Target Reader: Readers of public-domain and historical texts

Book Edition: Project Gutenberg digital edition Book Language: en

Edition facts

Words 46,796

Reading time 204 min

Text sections 5

The catalog record for The Innocents: A Story for Lovers — Key Ideas to Explore provides practical reading context through 46,796 words, 3 hr 24 min estimated reading time, and 5 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 18.2 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Married people -- Fiction,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Source: Project Gutenberg record #25430

Sinclair Lewis's 1917 novel follows elderly New York couple Seth and Mother Appleby, whose affectionate banter and stubborn youthfulness are tested when Seth loses his shoe-store job and both take on holiday department-store work, revealing the strains and tenderness of long marriage.

Editorial Edition Score 4.7/5

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated

Description quality20 pts
Title & short description10 pts
Source metadata20 pts
Text length15 pts
Chapters / structure15 pts
EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

File: pg25430

Read the Text

They were rustic as a meadow-ringed orchard, yet Father and Mother had been born in New York City, and there lived for more than sixty years. Father was a perfectly able clerk in Pilkings's shoe-store on Sixth Avenue, and Pilkings was so much older than Father that he still called him, "Hey you, Seth!" and still gave him advice about handling lady customers. For three or four years, some ten years back, Father and Mr. Pilkings had displayed ill-feeling over the passing of the amiable elastic-sided Congress shoe. But that was practically forgotten, and Father began to feel fairly certain of his job.

There are three sorts of native New-Yorkers: East Side Jews and Italians, who will own the city; the sons of families that are so rich that they swear off taxes; and the people, descendants of shopkeepers and clerks, who often look like New-Englanders, and always listen with timid admiration when New-Yorkers from Ohio or Minnesota or California give them information about the city. To this meek race, doing the city's work and forgotten by the city they have built, belonged the Applebys. They lived in a brown and dusky flat, with a tortoise-shell tabby, and a canary, and a china hen which held their breakfast boiled eggs. Every Thursday Mother wrote to her daughter, who had married a prosperous and severely respectable druggist of Saserkopee, New York, and during the rest of her daytimes she swept and cooked and dusted, went shyly along the alien streets which had slipped into the cobblestoned village she had known as a girl, and came back to dust again and wait for Father's nimble step on the four flights of stairs up to their flat. She was as used to loneliness as a hotel melancholiac; the people they had known had drifted away to far suburbs. In each other the Applebys found all life.

In July, Father began his annual agitation for a vacation. Mr. Pilkings, of Pilkings & Son's Standard Shoe Parlor, didn't believe in vacations. He believed in staying home and saving money. So every year it was necessary for Father to develop a cough, not much of a cough, merely a small, polite noise, like a mouse begging pardon of an irate bee, yet enough to talk about and win him a two weeks' leave. Every year he schemed for this leave, and almost ruined his throat by sniffing snuff to make him sneeze. Every year Mr. Pilkings said that he didn't believe there was anything whatever the matter with Father and that, even if there was, he shouldn't have a vacation. Every year Mother was frightened almost to death by apprehension that they wouldn't be able to get away.

Father laughed at her this July till his fluffy hair shook like a dog's ears in fly-time. He pounded his fist on the prim center-table by which Mother had been solemnly reading the picture-captions in the _Eternity Filmco's Album of Funny Film Favorites_. The statuettes of General Lafayette and Mozart on the false mantel shook with his lusty thumping. He roared till his voice filled the living-room and hollowly echoed in the porcelain sink in the kitchen.

"Why," he declaimed, "you poor little dried codfish, if it wasn't for me you'd never have a vacation. You trust old dad to handle Pilkings. We'll get away just as sure as God made little apples."

"You mustn't use curse-words," murmured Mother, undiscouraged by forty years of trying to reform Father's vocabulary. "And it would be a just judgment on you for your high mightiness if you didn't get a vacation, and I don't believe Mr. Pilkings will give you one, either, and if it wa'n't for--"

"Why, I've got it right under my hat."

"Yes, you always think you know so much more--"

Father rounded the table, stealthily and treacherously put his lips at her ear, and blew a tremendous "Zzzzzzzz," which buzzed in her ear like a file on a saw-blade.

Mother leaped up, furious, and snapped, "I'm simply ashamed of you, the way you act, like you never would grow up and get a little common sense, what with scaring me into conniption fits, and as I was just going to say, and I only say it for your own good, if you haven't got enough sense to know how little sense you have got, you at your time of life, why, well, all I can say is--you ought to know better."

Then Father and Mother settled peacefully down and forgot all about their disagreement.

Continue Reading →

Sinclair Lewis opens The Innocents with a portrait of an elderly couple who still hold hands and cuddle in corners, despite calling each other “Father” and “Mother.” The narrator’s tone is affectionate but wry: Father sneaks cheap cigarettes behind Mother’s back, winking at the “shocked crochet tidy on the patent rocker.” Their rustic simplicity is undercut by the fact that both were born in New York City and have lived there for over sixty years. Lewis establishes their dynamic through small, concrete details—the silver fuzz of Father’s hair, Mother’s “rose-leaf cheeks”—and a narrative voice that treats their foibles with gentle amusement rather than sentimentality.

Diction and the Texture of Age

Lewis’s word choices reinforce the Applebys’ age without resorting to cliché. Father’s face is a “crab-apple,” Mother’s cheeks are “rose-leaf”—both homely, natural images that suggest weathered vitality. The narrator describes their walk as a “parade,” a mildly ironic term that elevates their ordinary stroll. When Mother sniffs at Father’s smoking, she calls him a “young smart Aleck,” a period-appropriate phrase that reveals her affectionate scolding. The dialogue is spare but telling: Father’s “Why—why—you don’t need—” when Mother announces her job shows his conventional hesitation, quickly overridden by the “new Father, the adventurer.” Lewis uses these verbal tics to mark the couple’s habits and the gentle power shifts between them.

Voice and the Narrator’s Intrusion

The narrator frequently steps in with asides that shape our reading. In the dedicatory introduction, Lewis calls the book a “flagrant excursion, a tale for people who still read Dickens and clip out spring poetry.” This self-conscious framing signals the novel’s deliberate old-fashionedness. Within the story, the narrator’s commentary—such as noting that Father “was a person of stubborn youthfulness”—blends observation with judgment. When Father tries to hide his weariness from Mother, the narrator tells us he “artificially brightened his expression,” a phrase that exposes his performance. These intrusions create a confiding tone, as if the narrator is sharing a private knowledge of the couple’s inner lives.

Structure and the Rhythm of Routine

The excerpts reveal a narrative structure built around daily routines and their disruption. Chapter I establishes the Applebys’ settled life through repeated actions: Mother trying to stop Father’s smoking, their walks, Father’s work at Pilkings’s shoe-store. The rhythm is broken when Father loses his job and takes a temporary holiday-help position in a leather-goods department. Lewis devotes considerable space to Father’s first day, cataloging his struggles with unfamiliar merchandise and demanding customers. The shift from familiar shoe-selling to chaotic holiday retail mirrors the couple’s larger displacement. Mother’s parallel job-hunting is introduced as a surprise, but the narrative quickly returns to the pattern of their shared evenings, suggesting that their bond absorbs these shocks.

Recurring Details and Their Weight

Lewis repeats certain motifs to anchor the couple’s world. The amber cigarette-holder and cheap cigarettes appear twice in the opening pages, a token of Father’s small rebellions. The “patent rocker” with its “shocked crochet tidy” is a domestic detail that personifies their home. Later, the coal fire in their room “shone through the front draught of the stove, and threw a faint rose on her crossed hands,” echoing the earlier “rose-leaf” description of Mother’s cheeks. These recurrences create a texture of familiarity. Even the word “innocents” in the title resonates against Father’s “defenseless” feeling in the store, where he cannot dodge questions and is exposed to the city’s impersonal holiday rush.

Readers attentive to Lewis’s authorial choices will notice how he balances sentiment with a sharp eye for social detail. The Applebys are not merely sweet; they are products of a specific urban milieu, and their struggles with aging and economic insecurity are rendered through precise observation of behavior and speech. The novel rewards attention to its small moments—a wink, a hesitation, a phrase repeated—rather than dramatic plot turns.

I’ve always thought The Innocents carries a particular ache—that late-life love made of quarrels and quiet repairs. It reminds me of another old friend, Somehow Good — Themes and Context, which holds a similar warmth: two people stumbling toward each other through pride and misunderstanding. Both books whisper that tenderness survives the clumsiest years. I shelve them close, like old neighbors sharing a fence.